1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 202 Cal.App.3d
  5. 202 Cal.App.3d 95 (1988)
 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. PATTERSON

Docket No. A039002.

202 Cal.App.3d 95 (1988)

248 Cal. Rptr. 290

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JAY PATTERSON, as Registrar of Voters, etc., Defendant and Respondent; RICHARD GUICHARD, Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

June 15, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arlo Hale Smith for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Louise H. Renne, City Attorney, Dennis Aftergut, Burk E. Delventhal and Randy Riddle, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

RACANELLI, P.J.

This case concerns the validity of a preelection removal of an initiative ordinance from the San Francisco ballot.

FACTS

We outline the procedural/factual background to the questions presented.

Appellant Robert Guichard was a proponent of a petition for an initiative ordinance to be submitted to the electorate at a special election scheduled for June 2, 1987. The ballot proposal, entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases