1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 35 Ohio
  5. 35 Ohio St. 3d 254 (1988)
 

CITY OF CINCINNATI v. BUDGET COMM. OF HAMILTON CTY.

No. 86-1860.

35 Ohio St. 3d 254 (1988)

CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLANT, v. BUDGET COMMISSION OF HAMILTON COUNTY; HAMILTON COUNTY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 16, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Castellini, city solicitor, and Nancy H. Simmons, for appellant. Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Thomas J. Scheve, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, the city of Cincinnati, argues that the BTA should have held another hearing before it reversed its initial finding regarding the inclusion of capital improvement and debt charge items in the budget of the county. It maintains that both the BTA and this court determined that there was insufficient evidence to support the deduction of such items. The county argues that the BTA has no mandatory duty to conduct another hearing and that its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases