CITY OF CINCINNATI v. BUDGET COMM. OF HAMILTON CTY.

No. 86-2053.

35 Ohio St. 3d 252 (1988)

CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLEE, v. BUDGET COMMISSION OF HAMILTON COUNTY; CITY OF WYOMING, APPELLEE; HAMILTON COUNTY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 16, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Castellini, city solicitor, and Nancy H. Simmons, for appellee city of Cincinnati.

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Thomas J. Scheve, for appellant.

Santen, Shaffer & Hughes and Franklin A. Klaine, Jr., for appellee city of Wyoming.


Per Curiam.

Relying on Springfield v. Bethel Twp. (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 132, 15 O.O.3d 165, 399 N.E.2d 1237, and Cincinnati v. Budget Comm. of Hamilton Cty. (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 137, 25 OBR 184, 495 N.E.2d 396, the county argues that the BTA should have reviewed the cross-assignment of error. Cincinnati argues that it was the only party that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases