STATE v. GILLARD

No. 87-352.

40 Ohio St. 3d 226 (1988)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. GILLARD, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 30, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Horowitz, prosecuting attorney, Richard D. Reinbold, Jr. and John F. Anthony, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Gutierrez, Mackey & Gwin Co., L.P.A., John N. Mackey and Kathleen M. Tatarsky, for appellee and cross-appellant.


MOYER, C.J.

The state asserts six propositions of law and Gillard's cross-appeal asserts two propositions of law. For the reasons that follow, we sustain the state's propositions of law, overrule Gillard's propositions of law, and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

I

The state's first proposition of law stems from a dispute over the procedures to be followed under Crim. R. 16(B)(1)(e), which provides as follows:

"* * * Names and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases