1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 140 Misc.2d
  5. 140 Misc.2d 103 (1988)
 

SCARMINACH v. GOLDWELL GmbH

140 Misc.2d 103 (1988)

Tonilynn Scarminach, Plaintiff, v. Goldwell Gmbh et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Monroe County.

June 22, 1988

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jaeckle, Fleishman & Mugel (Edward Yankelunas of counsel), for Goldwell GmbH, defendant. Harris, Beach, Wilcox, Rubin & Levey (James C. Gocker of counsel), for Goldwell of New York, Inc., defendant. Harter, Secrest & Emery (Margaret Catillaz of counsel), for Linda Condon, defendant. Greisberger, Zicari, McConville, Cooman, Morin & Welch, P. C. (Kevin S. Cooman of counsel), for plaintiff.

DAVID O. BOEHM, J.

Whether discovery against a defendant, West German corporation, should proceed in accordance with the procedures of the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (opened for signature, Mar. 18, 1970, 23 UST 2555, TIAS No. 7444 [hereinafter Hague Convention or Convention]) or New York's Civil Practice Law and Rules, raises an issue of first impression...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases