GREAT ADVENTURE, INC. v. JACKSON TP.


10 N.J. Tax 230 (1988)

GREAT ADVENTURE, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 8, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur M. Greenbaum argued the cause for appellant (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Bergstein, attorneys; Barry S. Goodman and Peter J. Zipp on the brief).

Stanley Tannenbaum argued the cause for respondent (Sills, Beck, Cummis, Zuckerman, Radin, Tischman & Epstein, attorneys; Jerald D. Baranoff and Thomas Denitzio, Jr. on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, MUIR, Jr. and SKILLMAN.


PER CURIAM.

The primary issue on this appeal from a declaratory judgment entered by the Tax Court is whether owner-occupied commercial property constitutes income-producing property within the intendment of N.J.S.A. 54:4-34 (so-called chapter 911). The Tax Court concluded that it does not, and we concur.

The subject premises, located in Jackson Township are owned by plaintiff Great Adventure, Inc., a Delaware corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases