1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 839 F.2d
  5. 839 F.2d 1544 (1988)
 

JAMESBURY CORP. v. LITTON INDUS. PRODUCTS, INC.

No. 87-1106.

839 F.2d 1544 (1988)

JAMESBURY CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LITTON INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 10, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Miller of Oblon, Fisher, Spivak, McClelland & Maier, Arlington, Va., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Arthur I. Neustadt of Oblon, Fisher, Spivak, McClelland & Maier. Of counsel were Charles L. Gholz, of Oblon, Fisher, Spivak, McClelland & Maier and Richard H. Berneike, of Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Donald R. Dunner, of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellee.

Before SMITH, NIES, and ARCHER, Circuit Judges.

EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Jamesbury Corp. (Jamesbury) sued Litton Industrial Products, Inc. (Litton), for infringement of its patent, United States patent No. 2,945,666 (the '666 patent). The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut granted summary judgment in favor of Litton on the issues of laches and estoppel.1 We affirm.

Issues

(1) Whether the district court erred in holding that the law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases