WINN v. EDNA HIBEL CORP.

No. 87-5382.

858 F.2d 1517 (1988)

Sol WINN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDNA HIBEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

October 28, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis A. Nowak, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Jeffrey A. Tew, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Kenneth A. Marra, Nason, Gildan, Yeager & Gerson, P.A., Nathan E. Nason, West Palm Beach, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

Before TJOFLAT and HILL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, District Judge.


TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

In this case, a manufacturer of artwork terminated a dealership which was selling its artwork for less than the manufacturer's suggested retail prices. The dealer sued the manufacturer for money damages under section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1982), claiming that the manufacturer terminated him pursuant to a conspiracy between the manufacturer and a competing dealer.

The case came on for trial, and at the close...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases