HOWARD v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 86-1951.

37 Ohio St. 3d 195 (1988)

HOWARD, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 22, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A., Fred Siegel and Wayne E. Petkovic, for appellant.

John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, Richard A. Wise and William J. Day, for appellees.


Per Curiam.

The principles followed by this court in reviewing the BTA's real property value determinations are stated in the syllabus in Cardinal Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Bd. of Revision (1975), 44 Ohio St.2d 13, 73 O.O. 2d 83, 336 N.E.2d 433, as follows:

"2. The Board of Tax Appeals is not required to adopt the valuation fixed by any expert or witness. * * *

"3. The Board of Tax...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases