CALLOWAY v. MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP

Nos. 275, 385, Docket 86-7752, 86-7754 and 87-7262.

854 F.2d 1452 (1988)

Northern J. CALLOWAY, individually and on behalf of LMN Productions, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. The MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, A DIVISION OF CADENCE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, James Galton, Al Brodax, Michael S. Klein, Luis Quiros, the Shukat Company, Ltd., Scott Shukat and Peter S. Shukat, Esq., Defendants-Appellees, The Marvel Entertainment Group, a division of Cadence Industries Corporation, James Galton and Al Brodax, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. The MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, A DIVISION OF CADENCE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, James Galton, Al Brodax, Michael S. Klein, Luis Quiros and LMN Productions, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The SHUKAT COMPANY, LTD., Scott Shukat and Peter S. Shukat, Esq., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees, The Shukat Company, Ltd., and Scott Shukat, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, Pavelic & LeFlore (now dissolved), counsel at trial for plaintiff, Appellants-Cross-Appellees, Ray L. LeFlore, individually and as a partner of Pavelic & LeFlore (now dissolved), Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided August 12, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Piel, New York City (Robert J. Katz, Arline Mann, Merle M. Martin, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, of counsel), for appellant-cross-appellee Ray L. LeFlore.

Radovan Pavelic, New York City, pro se for appellant-cross-appellee Pavelic & LeFlore (now dissolved).

Robert B. McKay, Santora & McKay, New York City, for defendants-appellees, cross-appellants The Marvel Entertainment Group, James Galton and Al Brodax.

Norman B. Arnoff, New York City, (Linda K. Brockett, Rosilyn, Newman, Arnoff & Siskind, New York City, of counsel), for third-party defendant-appellee Peter S. Shukat.

Sol V. Slotnik, Pomerantz & Slotnik, New York City, for third-party defendants-appellees The Shukat Co., Ltd. and Scott Shukat.

I. Scott Bieler, New York City (E. Michael Bradley, Brown & Wood, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Luis Quiros.

Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges.


WINTER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal and cross-appeal require us principally to decide whether sanctions of $200,000 were properly imposed under Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P., on an attorney, his firm and his client. We also address the question of whether sanctions may be imposed under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 after a case has been settled and dismissed. The sanctioned attorney, Ray L. LeFlore, appeals from Judge Sweet's award of $50...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases