1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 51 Wn.
  5. 51 Wn. App. 176 (1988)
 

ESTATE OF FRIEDMAN v. PIERCE CY.

No. 10819-4-II.

51 Wn. App. 176 (1988)

752 P.2d 936

THE ESTATE OF BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, ET AL, Appellants, v. PIERCE COUNTY, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

April 18, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy J. Whitters, Patricia K. Schafer, and Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, for appellants.

Joseph F. Quinn (of McCormick, Hoffman, Rees, Faubion & Quinn, P.S.), Special Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

WORSWICK, J.

A landowner who, because of a restrictive governmental regulation, is deprived of the economically reasonable use of his land, may be entitled to compensation for an inverse taking. See Agins v. Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255, 65 L.Ed.2d 106, 100 S.Ct. 2138 (1980). However, the landowner first must show that he has applied for permission for such use and has been refused, or that application would be futile. Orion Corp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases