ILLINOIS NAT. GUARD v. F.L.R.A.

Nos. 87-1290, 87-1345 and 87-1346.

854 F.2d 1396 (1988)

ILLINOIS NATIONAL GUARD, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, National Federation of Federal Employees, Intervenor. WYOMING AIR NATIONAL GUARD and Department of Defense, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. CALIFORNIA NATIONAL GUARD and Department of Defense, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided August 19, 1988.

As Amended September 6, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph R. Reyna, Atty., Nat. Guard Bureau, with whom John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen.*, William Kanter, Sandra Wien Simon, Attys., Dept. of Justice and James C. Hise, Atty., Nat. Guard Bureau, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners/cross respondents.

James F. Blandford, Atty., Federal Labor Relations Authority, with whom Ruth E. Peters, Sol., William E. Persina, Deputy Sol. and Arthur A. Horowitz, Associate Sol., Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent/cross-petitioner. Susan Berk, Atty., Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for respondent/cross-petitioner.

H. Stephen Gordon and Bruce P. Heppen were on the brief for intervenor, Nat. Federation of Federal Employees. Alice L. Bodley, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for intervenor, Nat. Federation of Federal Employees.

Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, BUCKLEY, and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG.

D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) held that, under the Federal Employees Federal and Compressed Work Schedules Act of 1982 (Schedules Act), the National Guards of three states must bargain with certain of their full-time employees over the establishment of compressed work schedules. The Guards, joined by the Department of Defense, petition for review, arguing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases