1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 223 N.J.
  5. 223 N.J. Super. 1 (1988)
 

TANNOCK v. NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO.

223 N.J. Super. 1 (1988)

537 A.2d 1307

JOHN TANNOCK, T/A JOHN TANNOCK STUDIOS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 28, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. McKenna, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent.

Charles A. Sweeney, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant.

Douglas S. Eakeley argued for intervenor, National Telephone Directory Corporation (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, attorneys, William F. Hyland of counsel; Douglas S. Eakeley and David W. Garland, on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and HAVEY.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, an aerial photographer, instituted this action against defendant for consequential damages arising out of defendant's breach of an advertisement contract. In an opinion published at 212 N.J.Super. 506 (Law Div. 1986) summary judgment was granted to plaintiff on the issue of liability. At the conclusion of plaintiff's evidence in a jury trial on the issue of damages, the trial judge ruled that plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases