CENTEL CABLE TV v. ADMIRAL'S COVE ASSOCIATES

No. 87-5463.

835 F.2d 1359 (1988)

CENTEL CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADMIRAL'S COVE ASSOCIATES, LTD., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

January 19, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry S. Bienstock, Philip J. Kantor, Frates Bienstock & Sheehe, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Paul Glist, Cole, Raywid & Braverman, Washington, D.C., for Florida Cable Television, Ass'n, Inc.

Howard Graff, Bloch, Graff, Danzig & Helline, New York City, for Cable Holdings of Georgia.

E. Cole Fitzgerald, III, Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Fitzgerald & Sheehan, P.A., Thomas A. Sheehan, III, West Palm Beach, Mark J. Tauber, Piper & Marbury, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees.

Before FAY and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges, and MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge.


FAY, Circuit Judge:

Centel Cable Television Company of Florida ("Centel") moved for a preliminary injunction under section 621(a)(2) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(2) (Supp. III 1985) ("section 621(a)(2)") to allow it to provide cable television to a new residential community.1 The district court judge dismissed the case on the basis that there was not an implied private right of action for section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases