SHURANCE v. PLANNING CONTROL INTERN., INC.

No. 87-8247.

839 F.2d 1347 (1988)

Joseph E. SHURANCE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PLANNING CONTROL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 18, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Nakazato, Kircher & Nakazato, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-petitioner.

No appearance for plaintiff-respondent.

Before TANG, FLETCHER and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Petitioner (PCI) seeks leave under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) to appeal the district court's denial of PCI's motion to disqualify opposing counsel.1 Before the district court, PCI argued that counsel should be disqualified for violating professional ethics by contacting a former PCI employee and obtaining privileged information about that employee's communications with PCI's corporate counsel.

The issue is whether we may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases