PRINCE v. BRYDON

TC 8312-07715; CA A41261; SC S34927.

764 P.2d 1370 (1988)

307 Or. 146

Jan PRINCE, Plaintiff (below), and Brad Littlefield, Petitioner On Review, v. Ian BRYDON, Zed W. Braden, James L. Brooks, and Roy King, Defendants (below), and John R. Hansen, Jr., Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted May 4, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary M. Berne, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Robert J. McGaughey and Stoll, Stoll, Berne, Fischer, & Lokting, P.C., Portland.

Ridgeway K. Foley, Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review.


LINDE, Justice.

Plaintiff, Brad Littlefield, seeks to hold defendant John R. Hansen, Jr. (the other parties named in the title are not involved in this appeal) liable for losses that plaintiff suffered as a result of purchasing in Oregon a limited partnership in an Idaho partnership that had not been registered as a "security" as required under the Oregon Securities Act, ORS 59.055. Hansen's role was that of a lawyer preparing documents and performing other legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases