1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 684 F.Supp.
  5. 684 F.Supp. 1438 (1988)
 

LOVELACE v. WHITNEY

No. 84 C 2788.

684 F.Supp. 1438 (1988)

Eldridge LOVELACE, Plaintiff, v. Bernard WHITNEY; William H. Hall and Scott Turow, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

May 3, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eldridge Lovelace, pro se.

Morris D. Witney, Witney & Witney, Joan C. Laser, Asst. U.S. Atty., Bernard B. Nathan, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Pro se plaintiff Eldridge Lovelace brings this action against former Assistant United States Attorney Scott Turow1 and two other private attorneys, Bernard Whitney and William H. Hall. Turow has filed a motion to dismiss on the basis of absolute immunity. Hall has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or for judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases