STATE v. PRINCE

8605 1174; CA A42230.

760 P.2d 1356 (1988)

93 Or.App. 106

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Charles Carpenter PRINCE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Resubmitted February 2, 1988.

Decided September 14, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. McCrea, P.C., Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Terry Ann Leggert, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.


Resubmitted In Banc February 2, 1988.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The issue is whether the supporting affidavit is sufficient. We affirm.

The first paragraphs of Officer Curths' affidavit detail...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases