IN RE PHELPS

OSB 85-102, 86-19; SC S34047.

760 P.2d 1331 (1988)

306 Or. 508

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of James H. PHELPS, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided August 30, 1988.

Reconsideration Denied October 18, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark M. McCulloch, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for the accused.

George A. Riemer, Gen. Counsel, Oregon State Bar, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed a brief for the Oregon State Bar.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and LENT, LINDE, CARSON, JONES and GILLETTE, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating numerous disciplinary rules in his handling of four different transactions. A Trial Panel of the Disciplinary Board found most of the charges proven by clear and convincing evidence and decided that the accused should be suspended from the practice of law for three years and required to pass the ethics portion of the Bar examination as a condition of reinstatement. On review de novo in this court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases