1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 692 F.Supp.
  5. 692 F.Supp. 1382 (1988)
 

GOLD STAR CO., LTD. v. U.S.

Court Nos. 86-11-01438, 86-12-01636, 86-11-01448 and 87-01-00021.

692 F.Supp. 1382 (1988)

GOLD STAR CO., LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Zenith Electronics Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor, Independent Radionic Workers of America, et al., Defendants-Intervenors. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants, Zenith Electronics Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor, Independent Radionic Workers of America, et al., Defendants-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

July 29, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, Michael P. House, William Planert, William Silverman, Leslie H. Wiensenfelder, Ryan Trainer and Douglas J. Heffner, Washington, D.C., for Gold Star Co., Ltd., plaintiffs.

Arnold & Porter, Thomas B. Wilner, Sukhan Kim, M. Howard Morse, Jeffrey M. Winton, Grant E. Finlayson, Sarah J.C. Reynolds and Evan T. Bloom, Washington, D.C., for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., plaintiffs.

John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Elizabeth Seastrum, of counsel: Robert E. Nielsen, Attorney-Advisor, Office of the Chief Counsel for International Trade, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C., for defendants.

Frederick L. Ikenson, Frederick L. Ikenson, J. Eric Nissley and Larry Hampel, Washington, D.C., for Zenith Electronics Corp., defendant-intervenor.

Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott, Paul D. Cullen, Laurence J. Lasoff and Mary T. Staley, Washington, D.C., for Independent Radionic Workers of America, et al., defendants-intervenors.

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Judge.

This consolidated action is before the Court on plaintiffs' (Gold Star Co. Ltd., et al., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.) (hereinafter "Gold Star" and "Samsung" respectively) motion for summary judgment on the administrative record pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of this Court. Plaintiffs challenge the legality of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration's ("ITA" or "Commerce") scope clarification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases