DIV. 1, DETROIT, BROTH. OF L. ENG. v. CONSOL. RAIL CORP.

Nos. 85-1782, 86-1016.

844 F.2d 1218 (1988)

DIVISION NO. 1, DETROIT, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, Plaintiff-Appellee (85-1782), Plaintiff-Appellant (86-1016), v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant (85-1782), Defendant-Appellee (86-1016).

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 14, 1988.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied May 31, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold M. Provizer, Provizer, Eisenberg, Lichtenstein & Pearlman, P.C., Marilyn A. Madorsky (argued), Southfield, Mich., for Div. No. 1, Detroit Broth. of Locomotive Engineers.

Lucy S.L. Amerman (argued), Dennis Alan Arouca, Philadelphia, Pa., Gary E. Murg, Nancy S. Katz, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Detroit, Mich., Cary Alan Metz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Consol. Rail Corp.

Before JONES and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied in No. 86-1016 May 31, 1988.

CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

These consolidated appeals arise from the district court's grant of a status quo injunction against defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), and its subsequent order requiring plaintiff Division No. 1, Detroit, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (BLE) to post a $750,000 bond as security for the injunction. Conrail contends on appeal that under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases