MEAD REINSURANCE v. GRANITE STATE INS. CO.

No. 87-1804.

873 F.2d 1185 (1988)

MEAD REINSURANCE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-party-defendant-Appellant, and City of Richmond, Defendant-third-party-plaintiff-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 23, 1988.

As Amended January 30, 1989.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing April 27, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Martin, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, Cal., for third-party-defendant-appellant.

Louis H. Castoria, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Wilbur J. Russ, Russ & Ripley, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-third-party-plaintiff-appellee.

Before FERGUSON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and McDONALD, District Judge.


McDONALD, District Judge:

Granite State Insurance Company (Granite) appeals the District Court's granting of the City of Richmond's (City) motion for summary judgment.

Granite contends that the District Court erred in holding that: (1) the underlying actions brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 constituted "two occurrences," and (2) Mead Reinsurance's (Mead) "ultimate net loss," pursuant to its insurance policy, included attorney fees and costs incurred in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases