1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 855 F.2d
  5. 855 F.2d 1174 (1988)
 

N.L.R.B. v. AQUABROM, DIV. OF GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL

No. 77-1732.

855 F.2d 1174 (1988)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AQUABROM, DIVISION OF GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL CORPORATION, as successor to Bromine Division, Drug Research, Inc.; Tesco Chemicals, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided August 24, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence Scoville, argued, Suanne Trimmer, Clark, Klein & Beaumont, Detroit, Mich., Robert Brigham, West LaFayette, Ind., for respondent.

Bernard Jeweler, Contempt Litigation, Elliott Moore, Paul Spielberg, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, William Bernstein, Karen Cordry, argued, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Kathy L. Krieger, P. Eveleth, for petitioner.

Before JONES, WELLFORD and GUY, Circuit Judges.

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

This seemingly endless labor dispute has now managed to reach this court in one form or another for the fourth, and we hope, final time. The current posture of the case is essentially the same as it was three years ago when the case was last before us. Specifically, the National Labor Relations Board ("Board") seeks to have respondents Aquabrom, Division of Great Lakes Chemical Corp. and Tesco Chemical, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases