1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 854 F.2d
  5. 854 F.2d 1166 (1988)
 

MATTHEWS v. HYSTER CO., INC.

Nos. 87-5796, 87-5844.

854 F.2d 1166 (1988)

Fred MATTHEWS, Elias Satola, Paul Bjazevich, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. HYSTER COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellants. Fred MATTHEWS, Elias Satola, Paul Bjazevich, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. LYKES BROTHERS STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Hyster Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 17, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rodney C. Pranin, Julie Sullwold Hernandez, Pranin & Muldoon, Wilmington, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants/cross-appellees.

J. Michael Crowe, Ann Kough, Crowe and Day, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee/cross-appellants.

Before GOODWIN, HALL, Circuit Judges, and SCHNACKE, District Judge.

SCHNACKE, District Judge:

I STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiffs (appellants/cross-appellees) appeal from a directed verdict in favor of defendant Hyster Company, Inc. Hyster (appellees/cross-appellants) appeals from the admission of evidence of subsequent design modifications made to the relevant machine. Jurisdiction over the appeal and the cross-appeal is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1982).

Plaintiffs Matthews, Satola and Bjazevich brought this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases