1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 681 F.Supp.
  5. 681 F.Supp. 1326 (1988)
 

U.S. v. HARDY

No. 86 CR 169.

681 F.Supp. 1326 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. James J. HARDY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

March 25, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anton R. Valukas, U.S. Atty., by Joseph H. Hartzler, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Philip C. Parenti, Philip C. Parenti, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

The matter concerns the government's motion for a rule to show cause why defendant's probation should not be revoked or, in the alternative, why defendant should not be held in contempt of court. For the reasons stated herein, both motions are entered and continued until after defendant has filed his 1987 tax returns and made all appropriate adjustments regarding payments specified under his restitution order.

I. FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases