Per Curiam.
Appellant first contends that the court of appeals' interpretation of Ohio Adm. Code 4121: 1-3-10(C)(11) violates the constitutional mandate that a safety regulation be a specific requirement. Second, appellant contends that appellee's unilateral negligence precludes a finding of VSSR liability. We agree with both contentions.
As to appellant's first contention, Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution states that the commission must...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
