1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 752 P.2d
  5. 752 P.2d 1235 (1988)
 

BECKER v. PORT DOCK FOUR, INC.

84-0232; CA A40754.

752 P.2d 1235 (1988)

90 Or.App. 384

Thomas R. BECKER and Sylvia F. Becker, Husband and Wife; and Silmot, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Respondents — Cross-Appellants, v. PORT DOCK FOUR, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant, Kurt Carstens, P.C., a Professional Corporation; and Kurt Carstens, Appellants — Cross-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter L. Barnhisel, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellants — cross-respondents. On the briefs was Fenner, Barnhisel, Willis and Barlow, Corvallis.

Mark McCulloch, Portland, argued the cause for respondents — cross-appellants. With him on the brief was Powers, McCulloch & Bennett, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

DEITS, Judge.

Plaintiffs Becker and Silmot, Inc., brought this legal malpractice action against defendant Carstens (defendant) for his failure to include certain conditions in the deed by which the Beckers conveyed real property to defendant Port Dock Four, Inc.1 The Beckers retained ownership of the parcel adjoining that property, and Silmot continued to operate a restaurant on the land which the Beckers retained.2<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases