SACKS v. ROTHBERG

No. 88-7009.

845 F.2d 1098 (1988)

Pauline SACKS and Marvin Sacks, Appellants, v. Herbert ROTHBERG.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 6, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Artabane, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Robert Plotkin and Robert E. Pokusa, Washington, D.C., for appellees.

Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.


ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL AS PREMATURE

Opinion PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

The question before us is whether a premature notice of appeal becomes effective to vest this court with jurisdiction once the district court disposes, finally, of all matters pending before it. We answer that question in the affirmative, and hold that this court has jurisdiction over the instant appeal.

Appellants, Pauline and Marvin Sacks, filed a complaint alleging...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases