NASH v. OVERHOLSER

No. 16680.

757 P.2d 1180 (1988)

114 Idaho 461

Connie NASH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James W. OVERHOLSER, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 10, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sudweeks, May, Shindurling, Stubbs & Mitchell, Twin Falls, for defendant-appellant. Jon J. Shindurling, argued.

Denman & Reeves, Idaho Falls, for the plaintiff-respondent. Reginald R. Reeves, argued.


HUNTLEY, Justice.

James Overholser appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion for summary judgment pursuant to an interlocutory appeal, wherein he asserts that the complaint filed by plaintiff, and former wife, Connie Nash, alleging five counts of assault and battery by him during the course of their marriage, was barred due to the res judicata effect of the decree of divorce entered between them. The court also granted partial summary judgment in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases