1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 687 F.Supp.
  5. 687 F.Supp. 1239 (1988)
 

SCALISE v. MEESE

No. 87 C 7898.

687 F.Supp. 1239 (1988)

Joseph Jerome SCALISE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edwin MEESE III, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

June 3, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne M. Burke, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Thomas P. Walsh, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Joseph Scalise and Arthur Rachel are in a jail in a land far, far away. They want to come home. The Attorney General of the United States has the power to grant their wish, but he refuses to exercise it. Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandamus ordering the Attorney General to establish regulations which would govern the grant or denial of their request...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases