WOOD v. DEPT. OF REVENUE

OTC 2365; SC S33889.

749 P.2d 1169 (1988)

305 Or. 23

Erskine B. WOOD and Ronnie Wood, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided February 2, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erskine B. Wood, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.

Jerry Bronner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Salem.


JONES, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the disallowance of a deduction for alimony1 to nonresidents of Oregon, when contrasted with the allowance of a deduction for alimony to residents of Oregon under ORS 316.127(1)(a), violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution, Article IV, section 2. No Oregon constitutional issue has been raised. In this appeal, the plaintiffs do not challenge the Tax...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases