CASCADE CORPORATION v. ROSE

WCB 84-12425, 84-09803; CA A41753.

759 P.2d 1127 (1988)

92 Or.App. 663

In the matter of the Compensation of William R. Rose, Claimant. CASCADE CORPORATION, Petitioner — Cross-Respondent, v. William R. ROSE, Respondent — Cross-Petitioner, and Cpp Security Service and the Hartford Insurance Group, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 24, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerald P. Keene, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Roberts, Reinisch & Klor, P.C., Portland.

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for respondent — cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland.

Stephen R. Frank, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the briefs was Tooze Marshall Shenker Holloway & Duden, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Cascade Corporation (Cascade) seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order, issued in an ORS 656.307 proceeding, holding it responsible for claimant's aggravation claim. Claimant cross-petitions for review of the Board's reversal of the referee's award of insurer-paid attorney fees. On de novo review, we affirm.

In April, 1982, claimant suffered a compensable injury to his right knee while employed by Cascade. His treating physician...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases