1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 35 Ohio
  5. 35 Ohio St. 3d 152 (1988)
 

VOLODKEVICH v. VOLODKEVICH

No. 87-62.

35 Ohio St. 3d 152 (1988)

VOLODKEVICH, APPELLEE, v. VOLODKEVICH, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 17, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce Parish and Richard J. Marco, Jr., for appellee.

Zashin, Rich, Sutula & Monastra Co., L.P.A., Bessie J. Cassaro and Robert I. Zashin, for appellant.

HERBERT R. BROWN, J.

To prevail on a motion filed pursuant to Civ. R. 60(B),1 the movant must demonstrate: (1) that the party is entitled to relief under one of the grounds stated in Civ. R. 60(B)(1) through (5); (2) that the party has a meritorious defense or claim to present if relief is granted; and (3) that the motion is made within a reasonable time. See GTE Automatic Electric v. ARC Industries (1976),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases