FIRST FINANCIAL SAV. v. AMERICAN INS. CO.

No. 88-33-CIV-5.

699 F.Supp. 1167 (1988)

FIRST FINANCIAL SAVINGS BANK, INC.; Home Savings and Loan Association; Pioneer Savings Bank; Richmond Federal Savings and Loan Association; Builders Federal Savings and Loan Association; Edgecombe Homestead and Loan Association; First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Pitt County; Preferred Savings Bank; Albemarle Savings and Loan Association; Gate City Federal Savings and Loan Association; Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Kings Mountain; and First Carolina Savings Bank, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC.; American Bankers Financial Services, Inc.; American Bankers Insurance Group, Inc.; Cardinal Savings Bank, Inc.; Interstate Securities, Inc.; First Union National Bank; Wallace J. Conner; Larry M. Dinkins; Roger L. Roode; Peter D. Lowrey; Samuel R. Crites; and Dennis DiMaggio, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division.

September 2, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael T. Medford, Manning, Fulton & Skinner, Raleigh, N.C., for plaintiffs.

Andrew B. Weissman, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Washington, D.C., for Roger L. Roode, Samuel R. Cretes, Peter D. Lowrey and Dennis DiMaggio.

Richard M. Hutson, Mount, White, Hutson & Carden, Durham, N.C., for American Bankers Ins. Co. of Florida, Inc., American Bankers Financial Services, Inc., American Bankers Ins. Group, Inc., Roger L. Roode, Peter D. Lowrey, Samuel R. Crites and Dennis DiMaggio.

J. Jerome Hartzell, Graham & James, Raleigh, N.C., for Cardinal Sav. Bank, Inc.

Jeffrey J. Davis, Moore & Van Allen, Charlotte, N.C., for Interstate Securities, Inc.

Martha J. Mason, Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, Raleigh, N.C., for First Union Nat. Bank.

Scott Hart, Mays & Valentine, Richmond, Va., for Wallace J. Conner.

Daniel W. Fouts, Joseph W. Moss, Adams, Kleemeier, Hagan, Hannah & Fouts, Greensboro, N.C., for Larry M. Dinkins.


ORDER

MALCOLM J. HOWARD, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motions of defendants Roode, Crites, Lowrey and DiMaggio (hereinafter "ABIC individual defendants") and defendant Larry Dinkins (hereinafter "Dinkins") to dismiss the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Claims for Relief based on violations of RICO.

FACTUAL HISTORY OF CASE

The factual history of this case has been discussed in some detail in this court's earlier orders...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases