DAVIDSON v. SUN EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION CO.

No. 88-1038.

857 F.2d 988 (1988)

Gail W. DAVIDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUN EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION CO., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 24, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis C. Reich, Reich & Binstock, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Franklin H. McCallum, Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Midland, Tex., Richard E. Olson, Roswell, N.M., for defendant-appellee.

Before RUBIN, JOHNSON, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Once again, the express terms of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), as interpreted by us in Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc.,1 require that we treat as ineffective a notice of appeal filed while a motion for a mistrial or new trial, albeit on only one issue in the case, was pending. That notice of appeal was a nullity, and no other notice was filed. We therefore lack jurisdiction and must dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases