PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges costs and attorney's fees totaling $2,580 assessed against him in eight written judgments of guilt. He argues that these items were improperly imposed because the trial judge did not mention the imposition of costs and attorney's fees at the sentencing hearing, so that the appellant did not have an opportunity to object.
The state concedes that this case is controlled by our decision in Sescon v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.