SCHWEITZER v. ESTATE OF HALKO

No. 87-371.

751 P.2d 1064 (1988)

Walter Adam SCHWEITZER, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. ESTATE OF Andrew C. HALKO, Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff. ESTATE OF Andrew C. HALKO, Third Party Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Clarke M. DAWSON, Third Party Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided March 25, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard F. Strause, Great Falls, for plaintiff and counter-defendant, defendant and counter-plaintiff.

William Conklin, Great Falls, for Dawson.

Bradley Parrish, Lewistown, for Schweitzer.


SHEEHY, Justice.

The Estate of Andrew Halko appeals from an order of the District Court, Tenth Judicial District, Judith Basin County, dismissing their claims against the defendant Clarke Dawson on the grounds that the applicable statute of limitations had run. We affirm.

The Halko estate presents two issues on appeal. They are:

1. Did the trial court err in granting summary judgment on the basis of the statute of limitations having run?

2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases