HOLMES, J.
This case presents two issues for our consideration. We are first asked to decide whether appellee Frank Sorrell was a "recreational user," as defined in R.C. 1533.18(B), at the time of his accident. For the reasons which follow, we hold that he was. Second, in their cross-appeal, the Sorrells ask this court to overrule its decisions in McCord v. Division of Parks & Recreation (1978),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.