1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 684 F.Supp.
  5. 684 F.Supp. 1113 (1988)
 

SMITH v. I.N.S.

Civ. A. No. 87-1988-C.

684 F.Supp. 1113 (1988)

Kelly SMITH and Osagie Latif Ighile, Plaintiffs, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

April 11, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Southard, Neal Rosen, Bingham, Dana & Gould, Marjorie Heins, Massachusetts Civ. Liberties, Nelson Brill, Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Martha Sosman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boston, Mass., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

CAFFREY, Senior District Judge.

The controversy before the Court involves the constitutional validity of Section 5 of the Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986, Pub.L. 99-639, now codified as 8 U.S.C. §§ 1154(h) and 1255(e). Both parties have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court holds that the amendments do not offend the due process clause of the Fifth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases