WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY v. SURPRISE

WCB 85-03495; CA A42210.

748 P.2d 1024 (1988)

89 Or.App. 296

In the matter of the Compensation of Richard G. Surprise, Claimant. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. Richard G. SURPRISE, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 27, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Roess, Coos Bay, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Foss, Whitty & Roess, Coos Bay.

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief were Karen M. Werner and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.

Before WARDEN, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.


WARDEN, Presiding Judge.

Employer seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order which affirmed the referee in setting aside employer's denial of responsibility for claimant's treatment at a pain center and ordering employer to pay temporary total disability (TTD) for the period of claimant's treatment. Claimant, in his cross-petition, seeks review of the Board's reversal of a portion of the referee's order which had awarded penalties and attorney fees for employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases