STATE v. SINDAK

No. 16869.

749 P.2d 1018 (1988)

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Edward P. SINDAK, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Petition for Review Granted March 24, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell Egusquiza, of Beer & Cain, Boise, for defendant-appellant.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., David R. Minert, Deputy Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-respondent.


PER CURIAM.

Edward Sindak was found guilty of violating I.C. § 18-1509, enticing of children, by a magistrate division jury, a first offense punishable as a misdemeanor. On appeal to the district court, the judgment was affirmed. Sindak appeals from that decision. Although Sindak raises several grounds for reversal of his conviction, we conclude that one issue — the failure of the magistrate to hold Sindak's trial within the time period required by statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases