1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 526 N.E.2d
  5. 526 N.E.2d 1229 (1988)
 

STATE v. HELTZEL

No. 45A03-8802-CR-54.

526 N.E.2d 1229 (1988)

STATE of Indiana, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. William HELTZEL and Mark Kiesling, Appellees (Defendants below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District.

August 18, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, Jack F. Crawford, Pros. Atty., Michael S. Vass, Deputy Pros. Atty., Crown Point, for appellant.

David C. Jensen, Richard A. Hanning, Charles W. Webster, Eichhorn, Eichhorn & Link, Hammond, for appellees.

OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a dismissal of a complaint for indirect contempt.

The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal asserting two grounds:

(1) that the appellant failed to file a preappeal statement under Appellate Rule 2(C); and (2) that the motion to correct errors is defective in that it is not specific as required by Trial Rule 59(D)(2).

Proceedings for contempt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases