1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 842 F.2d
  5. 842 F.2d 909 (1988)
 

U.S. v. RUNNELS

Nos. 86-1923, 86-1922.

842 F.2d 909 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank RUNNELS, (86-1923), Arnold Shapero, (86-1922), Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided March 28, 1988.

Order Granting Rehearing May 3, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil H. Fink (argued), Keith E. Corbett (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., William J. Weinstein (argued), Joel L. Hoffman, Southfield, Mich., for plaintiff-appellant.

Keith E. Corbett (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for defendants-appellees.

Before GUY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Order Granting Rehearing En Banc May 3, 1988.*

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

In his petition for rehearing, Shapero points out that he did not plead guilty to the original indictment brought against him and Runnels, the indictment on which Runnels was ultimately tried. Instead, Shapero pled guilty to a superseding information which specifically charged him only with a scheme intended "to defraud the members of local 22 ... of the right...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases