SCHWARTZ v. H. MAIMIN CO., INC.

No. 87-0003.

523 So.2d 1224 (1988)

Harold SCHWARTZ and Rita Schwartz, His Wife, Appellants, v. H. MAIMIN CO., INC., and Custom Building Corporation of Broward, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold R. Ginsberg of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Ansel Simon & Cohn, Miami, for appellants.

Richard A. Sherman of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., and Wayne W. Pomeroy of Pomeroy, Pomeroy & Pomeroy, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of Defendant, H. Maimin Co., Inc., and remand for further proceedings. We do this because there is existent a genuine issue of material fact which precludes summary disposition. That issue is the date of the delivery of the fabric cutting machine in question, which date triggers the running and applicability of section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HERSEY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases