BLYDENSTEIN v. PRECOURT

No. 86-536.

541 A.2d 1198 (1988)

Dick BLYDENSTEIN, et al. v. Rinald PRECOURT.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

January 15, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl H. Lisman and Thomas D. Roberts of Lisman & Lisman, Burlington, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Stuart M. Bennett, P.C., Shelburne, for defendant-appellee.

Before ALLEN, C.J., PECK, DOOLEY and MAHADY, JJ., and BARNEY, C.J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.


MAHADY, Justice.

The present appeal arises from a claim for abuse of process. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. The trial court, however, granted defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and plaintiffs appealed. We affirm.

Plaintiffs claim that the alleged tort was committed when defendant filed a notice of appeal to this Court from a decision of the superior court. That decision concerned an appeal from the Shelburne...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases