1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 863 F.2d
  5. 863 F.2d 855 (1988)
 

LAITRAM CORP. v. CAMBRIDGE WIRE CLOTH CO.

Nos. 88-1209, 88-1210.

863 F.2d 855 (1988)

The LAITRAM CORPORATION and Intralox, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CAMBRIDGE WIRE CLOTH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 12, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Hayes, Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin & Hayes, Boston, Mass., argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Victor B. LeBovici.

G. Franklin Rothwell, Bernard, Rothwell & Brown, P.C., Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Bruce J. Hendricks.

Before MARKEY and RE, Chief Judges, and NICHOLS, Senior Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. (Laitram) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, No. S 83-3126, finding that the Cambridge Wire Cloth Company (CWC) did not infringe Patent Nos. 3,870,141, 4,051,949, and Re.30,341. We reverse and remand.

Background

In 1983, Laitram sued CWC for infringement of U.S. Patents 3,870,141 ('141), 4,051,949 ('949), 4,159,763 ('763) and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases