PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary. He contends that his right to due process of law was violated because he was not fully informed regarding the applicable law when he admitted violating an institution disciplinary rule. There is no merit to that contention. He also argues that the fine imposed is invalid. It is. Watson v. OSP,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.