KEERINS v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY

07-87-169; CA A45249.

753 P.2d 960 (1988)

91 Or.App. 180

Kim KEERINS, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Corrections Division, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 11, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Jan Londahl, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Scott McAlister, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary. He contends that his right to due process of law was violated because he was not fully informed regarding the applicable law when he admitted violating an institution disciplinary rule. There is no merit to that contention. He also argues that the fine imposed is invalid. It is. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or.App. 85,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases