RATKOSKY v. UNITED TRANSP. UNION

No. 87-3175.

843 F.2d 869 (1988)

Ronald J. RATKOSKY; Paul B. Brossard; Cloyd G. Case; Ray W. Coontz; J. Dipuccio; James D. Fogarty; Charles H. Girts; Robert Hanus; William C. Hansen; Rolf J. Haltrich; John H. Harrington; Thomas A. Kawecki; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION; Consolidated Rail Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed March 24, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wallace R. Steffen (argued), Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Norton N. Newborn (argued), Norton N. Newborn Co., L.P.A., Helen Kryshtalowych, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, Ronald J. James, Jeffrey H. Burton (argued), Consol. Rail Corp., Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants-appellees.

Before: MILBURN and GUY, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.


RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, fifty railroad workers, filed suit against the United Transportation Union (UTU or the Union) and the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) seeking damages and a change in their seniority rights. Specifically, plaintiffs brought a claim for "equitable reformation" of the collective bargaining agreement. Plaintiffs also alleged that the UTU breached its duty of fair representation to its members. Finally, plaintiffs alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases