1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 136 A.D.2d
  5. 136 A.D.2d 34 (1988)
 

KAPLAN v. HEINFLING

136 A.D.2d 34 (1988)

Robert Kaplan et al., Individually and as Members of Kaplan & Weissman, a Partnership, Respondents, v. Martin Heinfling et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 17, 1988

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Kaplan of counsel (Mazur, Carp & Barnett, P. C., attorneys), for respondents.

Joseph L. Forstadt of counsel (James Falick with him on the brief; Stroock & Stroock & Lavan), for appellants.

MURPHY, P. J., SULLIVAN and SMITH, JJ., concur.

SANDLER, J.

This action was originally commenced by Robert Kaplan and Steven Weissman, individually and as members of the partnership known as Kaplan & Weissman, to recover damages on varied grounds arising out of the alleged wrongful termination of the partnership as counsel to Englishtown Sportswear, Ltd. (Englishtown).

The plaintiff Robert Kaplan is the son of Eli Kaplan, who, during the relevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases