SCHMITTINGER v. SCHMITTINGER

Nos. 87-83, 87-84.

538 A.2d 1158 (1988)

Ruby M. SCHMITTINGER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Harold C. SCHMITTINGER, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided March 15, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H. Mayer, Washington, D.C., for Ruby M. Schmittinger.

William G. McLain, with whom John W. Karr, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for Harold C. Schmittinger.

Before MACK, TERRY and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.


STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Before us for a second time is a dispute concerning the correct interpretation of a separation agreement entered into in 1968 by Harold C. Schmittinger and Ruby M. Schmittinger. They were divorced four years later, and Mrs. Schmittinger remarried. In the first appeal, we held that Husband1 was obliged to continue making support payments for both Wife and their minor children notwithstanding her remarriage.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases